Hi Juerg:
Thanks’ in advance.
I am not talking comparing one from another transaction which I can divide by Product Type or Transaction Type it is the same transaction that has to be divided due to accounting and balance exposure reasons in 2 parts. (The later mentioned 5500000000001 transaction has to be divided in 2)
On the other hand, I was just simplifying the issue. I have more than 20 different MM products and I am using the Transaction type inside each Product type to differentiate 1 from the others (201 Leasing, 202renting, 200 simple loans, 203 factoring, 204 export credit, import credit and so on)
With this picture it will be better for you to understand my issue, I have some of the leasing, some of the renting, some of the .... that are long term and the others that are short term. I differentiate one 55A 200 ST from another 55A 200LT giving the GVC (03 Short Term Liabilities and 04 Long Term Liabilities)
As said, my problem is caused from those that are a LT with due date exceeding 1 year. They are LT in their whole life, but due to accounting reasons they have to be split between the current potion and the “not current portion”.
As mentioned in my first post with the correct customizing and running TPM15M it is correctly divided in 2 positions - one is maintained in the original GVC, the LT GVC and the CPLTD is assigned to the other GVC, the ST GVC. In the example I´ve created transaction 5500000000001 a 55A 200 with 04 GVC and when running the TPM15M the CPLTD of it is assigned to the 34 GVC. (34 Long Term Liab --> Short Term Liab)
Later, when running TPM18, it is correctly calculated to be posted, but to post to the correct accounts, that is, to diff. accounts (some accounts for the CPLTD and some for the other) I cannot use the GVC as a source of the AAR determination, only the Valuation Class.
Finally Ok with MM and the distinction between Trading, AFS and HTM, it was just an example, just focus in Liabilities, originally I had only one Liabilities Valuation Class (4 Liabilities) but to solve it I have had to divide it in 2 VC (43 Liabilities SHORT Term 44 Liabilities LONG Term)
The same rule has to be applied to bonds and other securities so will affect again the VC you mentioned (Trading, AFS and HTM) multiplying the number of VC´s.
Rgds
Claudio