Thanks:
You are right Ravi and in fact when doing the customizing of VC, GVC, AAR and Account determination I have realized about it. The solution, as you mention, was to differentiate via valuation class VC but I did not have to create new additional VCs as I thought and post in my previous answer.
As a simple example suppose I have a 55A 200 with due date less than 1 year, let’s call it Op number 1 - ST (short term) and another with due date 2 years from now, operation 2 - LT (long term)
The solution was to have 3 GVC and 2VC and 2 AAR (see following table)
Table 1
VA GVC VC
001 01 Short Term Liabilities 1 Short Term Liabilities
001 02 Long Term Liabilities 2 Long Term Liabilities
001 21 LTàShort Term 1 Short Term Liabilities
Table 2
Pr Type TType VC AAR
55A 200 1 AAR1
55A 200 2 AAR2
Op number 1 will have the GVC 01 (ST liabilities) from the beginning till the end and will always use AAR1
Op number 2 will have the GVC 02 (LT liabilities) Later when executing TPM15M will be split in 2 positions each one related to 2 GVCs: GVC 02 (the original the “non-CPLTD”) and GVC 21 (where the CPLTD of it will be allocated).
The CPLTD with the GVC 21 via table 1 will have VC 1 (3th entry of the table 1) and AAR1 (see table 2), that is the same as OP number 1 and as both are ST they will post to the same ST accounts.
The non-CPLTD of Op number 2 will remain in GCV 02 and with VC 2 and AAR2 to post to the long term accounts
Best Rgds
Claudio