Hi Experts,
We are implementing BCM and will sending payment requests to our bank and receiving payment status messages back from them, without using Swiftnet as an intermediary.
In this case, can we still use the Swiftnet ES Bundle except that our connection goes to our bank directly instead of to Swiftnet?
Thanks,
Jim
Hi Jim,
Make sure these 2 notes are in your system: 1722824 and 1497003.
thx,
greg
Thanks Gregory,
Note 1722824 talks about updating payment status without PI. We do have PI and are planning to use it for bank communication; it's just that we want to send/receive directly from our bank without going through Swiftnet.
Jim
Hi Jim,
There's an additional license cost to install the SAP Integration Package for SWIFT (SIPS) for PI.
So I would recommend that it's not worth paying this unless you are planning on using SWIFTnet for your bank connectivity.
A possible high level approach you could take:
Outbound:
Payment runs --> Approve batches in BCM --> DME/PMW files saved to application server directory --> files picked by PI --> PI Sends to Bank using SFTP
Inbound:
Bank creates Payment Status Report (PSR) files and bank statements --> Places on SFTP server --> PI picks these files --> PI transfers to application server directory --> Upload files into ECC (e.g. program FEB_FILE_HANDLING for bank statements).
I think this would be the simplest and most cost effective method for a single SAP-to-bank interface.
If you use multiple banks, then it would be worth looking into the SWIFTnet option.
Hope this helps,
Jack
Dear Jim
With the SAP Package for SWIFT (SIPS) / SWIFT bundle the main functionality is to implement
1) end-to-end security with HMAC-SHA256
2) generate the XML V. 2. 0 XML companion file, which contains the SWIFT address information (DN = distinguished name)
1) you could use as well for H2H connections as long as your bank accepts LAU
2) needs to replace with the H2H link info
The question is more do you really want to use SIPS - as SIPS needs PI to run.
Or you want to look into other LAU (e. g. PGP).
Best regards
Christoph
Hi Jain,
Thanks for your inputs.
Could you please let me know what is the use of TERM DAYS in AT15 and how it works while doing TPM1 valuation?
Thanks in advance for your valuable inputs.
Thanks,
NTR
Hi Experts:
Due to Client requirements I need to:
Amortization step and PMP assigned are
Deal
I have got same results in another deal created and here are th Cash Flow in Sap and the client
Issue:
When accruing interest TMP44 at 31.12.2010 I got the following
-----------------31.12.2010 ------------------
D: Interest 3.000
C: Interest to be paid (Liability) 3.000
-----------------------------------------------
When executing valuation TPM1
-----------------31.12.2010 ------------------
D: Interest 3.083
C: Loans (Liability) 3.083
-----------------------------------------------
So the amortized cost is wrong as the accrued interest is not taken into account
What Client needs to have is
When accruing interest TMP44 at 31.12.2010 I got the following
-----------------31.12.2010 ------------------
D: Interest 3.000
C: Interest to be paid (Liability) 3.000
-----------------------------------------------
When executing valuation TPM1
-----------------31.12.2010 ------------------
D: Interest 83
C: Loans (Liability) 83
-----------------------------------------------
Posting
-----------------31.12.2011 ------------------
D: Interest 3.356,30
C: Loans (Liability) 3.356,30
-----------------------------------------------
When accruing interest TMP44 at 31.12.2011 I got the following
-----------------31.12.2010 ------------------
D: Interest 3.000
C: Interest to be paid (Liability) 3.000
---------------------------------------------
So again the P/L interests account is "duplicated"
To solve this issue I have followed solution of this thread http://scn.sap.com/thread/3294700
The Adq. Value in Position Cy is obviously taken the accrued interest into account and the Am.Adq Value also due to the effect set to the update types AD1002 and AD1003
Could I solve the accrued interest effect in the amortization and get the same result without affecting the position in this way.
Tanks in advance
Claudio
Hi Gregoriy I have a simmilar issue with a PCC, maybe you can help, I would appreciate it too much
I ve posted on thread http://scn.sap.com/thread/3615452
thanks in advance
Claudio
Hi,
My client is implementing bank customer accounts.
The client requirement is to integrate treasury with the Bank Customer Accounts
What are the steps to be configured?
Please advice
with regards
raju
Hi,
My query relating to the Reporting
When we create the Flow Types.
Where we can see Flow Types updated or not?
how to edit the tables?
Please guide me
with regards
raju
Hi,
My query relating to settlement
I have posted number of transactions in Money market area (Fixed Deposits)
I want to see the report for single transaction and settle the transaction also
In t code TPM12 , there is column product type and valuation area
I want to see the report From Date to To Date. Please send me steps to follow.
With regards
raju
Hi,
Please give me some inputs in the below mentioned areas
My client having number of Subsidiary and Sister Concern Companies.
My Client is investing directly in the Subsidiary or Sister Concern Companies.
I have created BP as a Counterparty not a subsidiary.
is it correct?
or
any other steps involved in this ?
Hi All,
Kindly suggest me solution for the below issue:
I have created a FIXED DEPOSIT Transaction Successfully.then i have settled it successfully.
When I go to do the CORRESPONDENCE MONITOR it says as below:
Message no. FTR_GENERAL006
Kindly let me know if i miss to do any thing here.
But i have maintained correspondence activity for money market (Correspondence activity maintained mentioned below)
Company Code - ABC1
Prod. Category - 510 Fixed-term deposit
Product Type - 51A Fixed-term deposit
Transactn Type - 100 Investment
Activity Cat. - 20 Contract Settlement
Recpt/Send Type - COUNTERPARTY Counterparty
CorrespondClass - DEAL_MM Deal: Money Market
Kindly Suggest
Hi Mohan,
Corresponding Object contains administrative data and customizing data to create correspondence.
Please check whether you assigned BP group and Profile to Business Partner in Transaction - FTR_EXT_ASSIGN.
Regards,
Naresh Garla
Hi Jain,
Thanks for the reply.
I have checked all the options available.
As I mentioned earlier, BP to Vendor/ Vendor to BP and Customer to BP/ BP to Customer are working fine independently. The issue is when we have a customer and vendor with the same number.
Thanks,
Vamsi
Hi,
Both not for my release!
regards
Melanie
Hi expert,
Is there a function in SAP Treasury to transfer securities positions from one partner to another partner within a company code at the book value?
Regards
Miroslav
You should be able to use BAPI_FTR_FXT_DEALCHANGE
Hi All,
We have used Grouping Charact filed in Business Partner > Counterparty Role > Control data tab and trying to get this data automatically while creating financial transaction in analysis parameter tab ( Limit Management) for this we have used derivation strategy but it is not picking the value form business partner. Can anyone please guide how to fix this issue.
Derivation Strategy
Path :Treasury and Risk Management >Basic Analyzer Settings >Automatic Integration of Financial Objects in Transaction Master Data
Money Market >Define Derivation Strategy
Financial Transaction
Business Partner - Counterparty Role - Grouping Character
Hi Naresh,
Thank you so much for your reply.
I get the same issues even after implementing your suggestion.
If possible, could you please get me details & sequence of correspondence so that I'll cross check whether we have missed anthing here.
because recently only we have completed our rollout and we are facing many issues related to correspondence
Thanks again
Vimal