Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List - SAP ERP Financials - Treasury Applications
Viewing all 5623 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Re: Principal decrease at rollover

January 21, 2014, 12:18 am
$
0
0

Hi Sei,

 

 

>> I have found out that if I untick relevant to posting in the flow type definition of money market, the extra cash flow will be generated. But if I tick the option, the flow disappear and everything looks fine.


[Renatas]: could you please specify this node in Customizing?

 

>> However, I do not need FI postings for this business scenario  [...] I'm going to log to OSS to find out if this is a bug and if there's any note we can apply.


[Renatas]: there are a few methods how you can avoid posting of flows into FI - this is purely standard setup in SAP TRM, so you don't need to create an OSS message:

  • you can exclude the whole Product type from posting/ per Company code and Valuation area - SPRO -> TRM -> Transaction Manager -> General Settings -> Accounting -> Link to Other Accounting Components -> Exclude Product Types from Posting;
  • or you can exclude specific flows (Update types)/ per Update type and Valuation area - SPRO -> TRM -> Transaction Manager -> General Settings -> Accounting -> Link to Other Accounting Components -> Indicate Update Types as Relevant to Posting.

 

hope this will help you.

 

 

Kind regards,

 

Renatas

↧
Search

Re: Principal decrease at rollover

January 21, 2014, 12:56 am
$
0
0

The IMG path of the money market flow type configuration is as below:

FSCM -> TRM -> Transaction Manager -> Money Market -> Transaction management -> Flow Types -> Define Flow Types.

 

 

  • you can exclude the whole Product type from posting/ per Company code and Valuation area - SPRO -> TRM -> Transaction Manager -> General Settings -> Accounting -> Link to Other Accounting Components -> Exclude Product Types from Posting;

-> Our offshore loan is defined at transaction type level not product type level, so I cannot just exclude the whole product type.

 

  • or you can exclude specific flows (Update types)/ per Update type and Valuation area -SPRO -> TRM -> Transaction Manager -> General Settings -> Accounting -> Link to Other Accounting Components -> Indicate Update Types as Relevant to Posting.

-> I can explore on this option later. Thank you for your advice.


Actually, even when I tick "postings to FI", as far as there is no account assignment reference attached to the transaction, TBB1 will not pick up anything to post, and this is our current work around.

And in real business scenario, there will be no account assignment reference for user to key in since posting to FI is not required.


I have already logged the issue to OSS and they are logging on to our system to investigate at the moment, because final repayment should not be generated while roll over is carrying out, no matter what we config. The statistical cash flow is wrong and does not meet the common business requirement.

↧
↧

Re: Loan Management Transaction Code Difference

January 21, 2014, 5:45 am
$
0
0

Hi Sravan,

this TC are transactions of the position management within the SAP TRM (Transaction Manager).

 

TPM1/TPM2: you can execute the revaluation of positions (e.g. generating unrealized gains and losses of positions) - inclusive reversal

TPM12/TPM13: display the positions and the flows of your treasury positions

TPM18: execution of derived business transactions of your positions

TPM20: display the postings of your treasury flows

TPM28/TPM29: with this transactions you are able to repost existing positions from one accounting assignment reference to another - including reveral

 

I hope this will give you a little bit more understanding.

 

Cheers

Robert

↧

Re: IBAN number to be updated in house bank transfer letter.

January 21, 2014, 1:59 pm
$
0
0

Hi Lakshmi,

 

In T.C FBZP, go to Paying Methods in Country Code and select Country and Paying Method(Ex: c, or create your own for IBAN) and click on Details.

 

In there you will find Bank Details (you will find IBAN option).

 

Untitled.jpg

 

If you try to reallocate the payment in APP(if there are multiple payments), then you will see as below,

Untitled1.jpg

And below is the Output.

 

Untitled3.jpg

Hope this helps YOU!!!

 

Note: The IBAN in the screen is Invalid and is for Training Purpose Only

↧

TPM_migration A21-Account determination -Internal error TPM_TRAC1899

January 21, 2014, 8:31 pm
$
0
0

Dear Guru,

 

 

We’re upgraded sap from 4.6c to ECC6 . now We are on EA-FINSERV        Release 617       SP level 0002 .we activated function
FIN_TRM_LR_FI_AN , FIN_TRM_LR_FI_AN_2 and FIN_TRM_LR_FI_AN and FIN_TRM_LR_FI_AN_3

 

At the step A21 Convert account determination ,

 

First
we found an error that “no account is assigned to account symbol 4.6.2 of application 102” à we fix it by double click on error and add 4.6.2 with gl account manually

 

 

Re test execution , we found second problem

 

Second,we found similar error that “no account is assigned to account symbol 1 of application 105” we fix it by double click on application error 105 , at the account assignment screen there is no available row for insert a new assignment so that I clicked on
edit->copy->from account symbol . and I change the account symbol to 1 and gl account to my cash account.

 

 

Re test execution , we found third problem

 

the error message show  “Internal error: Undefined Situation     Message no. TPM_TRAC1899”

 

Could you please kindly suggest what I’ve missed .

 

Please note that on 4.6c we use only Money market transaction.

 

  

Thank you in advance

↧
↧

Stock Swap by Security Account

January 21, 2014, 11:46 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

 

We need to perform stock swap by security account. There are few lots with different security account in bond security. We need to perform stock swap just for some security account of a security id. In corporate action posting (FWKB),  i entered zero for the security account that does not need to perform stock swap, system prompt "Single Position Management: No lots are available on <swap date>" and not allow to post. Since this is a bond, we cannot use security right option. Any idea how can we handle bond swap by security account ?

↧

Portfolio Transfer for Money Market Transaction

January 22, 2014, 1:57 am
$
0
0

Hi Expert,

 

We used portfolio in all the product transaction. For money market product / OTC transaction, any idea how can we perform portfolio transfer ? Currently portfolio transfer option (TPM82) is only applicable to securities. For Money Market transaction, how can we perform portfolio transfer ?

 

Thank you.

↧

Re: Portfolio Transfer for Money Market Transaction

January 22, 2014, 2:10 am
$
0
0

Hi Oscar,

 

the portfolio in money market is merely an attribute in the deal, not a differentiation criterion as it can be in the securities area (with this differentiation, you can have two security positions which only differ in the portfolio).

Therefore, there is no transfer possibility in money market. You may change the portfolio directly in the deal.

 

Best regards,

Marie

↧
Search

Re: Stock Swap by Security Account

January 22, 2014, 4:44 am
$
0
0

Hi Oscar

 

If you do a corporate Action there is no possiblity to do it just for one security account. A corporate action takes place in the market and is valid for all shares or bonds.

 

Therefore you create the corporate action and run it for all the shares or bonds in your system. No other choice.

 

Regards

Juerg Heiz

juerg.heiz@treascon.com

↧
↧

Error while loading to 0cfm_init_positions

January 22, 2014, 5:03 am
↧

Re: SAP IHC with three Servers

January 22, 2014, 6:21 pm
$
0
0

Thanks for your replay Taro.

 

By using PI we can send/ receive  ALE/IDOCs (PAYEX and FINSTA) between three systems if we go with PI what are the advantages we will get. Can you please share any information if you have on PI.

↧

Re: FSCM-TRM-TM: Creating positions for cross currency swaps

January 23, 2014, 1:15 am
$
0
0

Hi Marie,

Note 921346 is working nicely now - in fact I forgot to run tpm18 on the contract, but with this I get the realized FX-gains and losses at conclusion of the deal. Now I would like to implement the intermediate realized gains & losses with note 1024279 as well, which stem from reductions in the principal amounts. I am somewhat confused, that the coding in method MANIPULATE_DERIVED_FLOWS seems to replace the coding for note 921346? Is that correct or do I have to add the coding from note 1024279 to the previous one? Best regards, Sebastian

↧

Re: FSCM-TRM-TM: Creating positions for cross currency swaps

January 23, 2014, 1:23 am
$
0
0

Hi Sebastian,

 

correct: the sample implementation for the BAdI from 1024279 replaces the one from 921346.

 

Best regards,

Marie

↧
↧

Re: TPM_migration A21-Account determination -Internal error TPM_TRAC1899

January 23, 2014, 3:45 am
$
0
0

Dear Anothai,

 

I am not sure if this issue can be answered in a general way via this forum - the error TPM_TRAC1899 is a very general one, triggered within the Treasury Accounting Adaptor (TRAC) in case of unexpected situations such as inconsistencies.


So without checking directly why it is triggered, it is hard to tell how to overcome it.

Maybe you have a consultant onsite which could have a look at it in debugging mode.

 

As you state that you convert only OTCs, you could check if you can find out at least for which deal(s) the error message is raised. If these are 'old' deals (end of term in the past), you could consider to exclude them from migration via report RFTR_MIGRATION_EXCLUDE_OTC as a quick fix.

 

Best regards,

Marie

↧

Re: Relation between DataFeed and Bloomberg

January 23, 2014, 7:50 am
$
0
0

One more question, how did you managed to get a HTTPA connection with Bloomberg?

↧
Search

Re: Principal decrease at rollover

January 23, 2014, 10:07 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

 

With your current settings, i.e. with flow types marked as not
postable it cannot work. The problem is that repayment flow will not
be created in appropriate activity if not postable.

 

To create deals in TRM you don't want to post to FI, you can do it by
controlling update types and not flow types. You can leave flow types as
postable like in standard, but leave update types as not relevant for
posting (Customizing: Indicate Update Types as Relevant to Posting).
Then transactions will be fixed in TRM, but not in FI. That should
fulfill your requirement.

 

Another option would be to create another offshore PType for each
domestic PType. I think that would also work. But the solution with
update types is better and is recomended.

 

Best regards,
Jasmine Li

↧

Re: Principal decrease at rollover

January 23, 2014, 10:20 pm
$
0
0

Hi Jasmine,

 

Thank you for your advice and your help from OSS too

We will follow your advice and control at update type level.

 

Thank you!

Kind regards,

 

Sei

↧
↧

Re: IHC BCA clearing account not being cleared

January 23, 2014, 10:48 pm
$
0
0

Hi

 

Thanks for verifying this IMG object and convincign me that BCA clearing acount should not be cleared in this way.

 

So going back to my original argument, from accountant point of view, the Payment request clearing account (Debit balance) created by F111, must be creditted and accounted for as the amount owned by your subsidiary. If BCA clearing CA is zero, this would create an inconsistency in your financial accounting from my viewpint at the time you execute GL transfer. I would normally run daily and F.13 to clear based on the posting date in GL account.

 

Maybe the book refere to these internal IHC transfer

IHC1ID - manual Internal debit memo

IHC1IP - manual Internal transfer

in the case where IHC would like to see the investment into subsidiary to broker (unlikely??) or anything.

 

cheers.

taro

 

 

 

 


↧

Re: FSCM-TRM-TM: Creating positions for cross currency swaps

January 24, 2014, 2:21 am
$
0
0

Hi Marie, we implemented note 1024279 by now and it seems to work nicely. However implementing it via snote, we got the return: Note is not compatible. In fact we had to perform some amendments when inserting the note manually as there are:

 

1. For method GET_PROFIT_OF_TRANS, we have made the parameter IM_FLG_CLOSE as optional parameter,

 

2. In method GET_PROFIT_OF_TRANS, we are calling a method COMPUTE_VALUES_BY_TRANSACTION and are expecting a return parameter (RE_VALUES).

 

This method doesn't have a return parameter and it has been changed to exporting parameter

 

ex_tab_value.

 

We are on SPP EA-FINSERV 606 0008 SAPK-60608INEAFINSRV. Perhaps we didn't get the right version for the note. If not, perhaps SAP should update the note. Best regards and many thanks for your instructions! Sebastian

 

↧

Re: FSCM-TRM-TM: Creating positions for cross currency swaps

January 24, 2014, 3:07 am
$
0
0

Hi Sebastian,

 

note 1024279 has actually two different sample implementations attached:

 

Note_1024279_BAdI_Impl.zip  and

BAdI_Impl_(EHP3_and_higher).txt

 

The second one actually includes the changes you mention, have you see it?

 

Best regards,

Marie

 

 


↧
Viewing all 5623 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>